Alarm Management for more Plant Safety, Security and Transparency
Central DashboardAlarm frequencies and shift events under control
Plant StatusDisplay of the system status
E-mail ReportsNotification via e-mail
ReportingGeneration of KPI reports
MOCTask management and release
Access ManagementCentral administration of user and group access rights
PLC/PCSInterface to PLC/PCS
Alarm RationalizationAlarm comparison, determination and documentation of the reasonsAlarm Management according to ISA 18.2, NAMUR NA102 and EEMUA 191 - for more Plant Safety, Security and Transparency
Plant Historian AM is a long-term archiving system for alarms and messages which facilitates and accelerates decision-making in critical situations, thus contributing to plant safety and security by:
Production downtimes, plant shutdowns or even accidents with fatal consequences for people, machines or the environment can be avoided.
More advantages for production:
Plant safety – transparency – central availability
An alarm management system records, archives, and analyzes alarms and messages from process control systems over the long term to help operators make faster decisions in critical situations. It complements the process control system itself—which displays alarms in real time—by providing a structured, analyzable history of these alarms over days, weeks, and years.
Alarm management records and archives alarms, along with their frequency and duration, while alarm rationalization builds on this data to systematically reduce unnecessary or redundant alarms. In Plant Historian, these two components are closely integrated: The KPIs recorded in alarm management form the basis for decision-making during the subsequent rationalization process.
Alarm management focuses on discrete events such as limit violations and fault messages, while process data archiving records continuous measurement values such as temperature or pressure over time. Both systems often use the same plant interface but analyze the data for different purposes.
ISA 18.2 is an international standard for the design, implementation, and evaluation of alarm management systems in the process industry, which defines KPIs such as the average alarm rate per operator and alarm duration, among others. An alarm management system that supports automated reporting in accordance with ISA 18.2 provides these metrics without the need for manual analysis.
NAMUR NA102 is a recommendation issued by NAMUR, the user association for automation technology in the process industry, that specifies requirements for alarm management systems, particularly for German-speaking and European regions. It supplements ISA 18.2 with practical guidelines for evaluating alarm situations during ongoing plant operation.
EEMUA 191 is a guideline published by the Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association that outlines best practices for the design and operation of alarm systems, including measures to prevent alarm flooding. Along with ISA 18.2, it is considered one of the most frequently referenced international standards for alarm management.
Key KPIs include the average alarm rate per operator, alarm duration, the percentage of follow-up and false alarms, and an analysis of alarm frequency over specific time periods. An alarm management system that automatically provides these metrics significantly reduces the manual effort required to document compliance for auditors or regulatory agencies.
Alarm flooding refers to a situation in which operators are confronted with so many alarms in a short period of time that it becomes nearly impossible to prioritize them effectively. An alarm management system provides clarity by organizing alarm lists according to priority and revealing the underlying patterns for future streamlining.
Chattering alarms are alarms that repeatedly go off and reset within a short period of time, usually as a result of fluctuations in measured values near a threshold. Follow-up alarms occur when an initial fault triggers a chain of subsequent alarms; analyzing them specifically helps distinguish the actual cause from mere symptoms.
An alarm management system identifies alarms that occur multiple times within a very short time window—about one second—as duplicates and flags them accordingly. This prevents a single event from artificially inflating the alarm statistics and skewing the KPI analysis.
Alarms and events can be automatically forwarded via text message, email, phone, or directly to the digital shift log, ensuring that the appropriate personnel are notified even when they are away from the control room. This direct forwarding significantly reduces response times during critical events compared to a purely visual display in the process control system.
Via OPC integration, Plant Historian AM can be connected to virtually any common process control system, including Siemens Simatic PCS7, S7, and WinCC; Emerson DeltaV; Honeywell Experion; ABB Freelance and 800xA; Foxboro I/A Series, as well as safety-critical systems such as HIMA HiMax and Invensys Triconex. This enables the centralized monitoring of even heterogeneous plant environments involving multiple DCS vendors.
Yes, additional process control systems or system components can be integrated without causing downtime in the existing environment. This is particularly relevant for company-wide rollouts across multiple locations, where implementation typically occurs in phases rather than all at once.
Alarm management enhances plant safety by providing transparency into alarm and event situations, thereby enabling faster, more informed decisions during critical moments. It has been proven to help prevent production losses, plant shutdowns, or—in the worst-case scenario—accidents resulting in injury, equipment damage, or environmental harm.
By systematically analyzing alarm frequency and patterns, recurring causes of malfunctions can be identified and resolved before they lead to unplanned downtime. In one documented case, a customer was able to reduce downtime and noticeably improve process quality within a few months by reducing the number of alarms.
Fewer unnecessary alarms and faster response times to truly relevant malfunctions have a direct impact on equipment availability, one of the three factors in the OEE calculation. Alarm management thus provides one of the levers that can be used to systematically increase Overall Equipment Effectiveness.
The metrics recorded in alarm management—such as alarm frequency, duration, and chattering behavior—form the fact-based foundation for subsequent alarm rationalization as well as for Management of Change (MoC) processes. Without this data, decisions regarding the reduction or adjustment of alarms would have to be based on experience rather than on reliable figures.
In the chemical industry, alarm management helps detect safety-related limit violations early on and automatically provides the metrics required by ISA 18.2 for audits and regulatory compliance. Documented implementations at one of the world’s largest chemical companies and at one of the largest refineries in the German-speaking world demonstrate its use in handling tens of thousands of daily alerts.
Yes, alarm management is also used in power plants and wastewater treatment facilities to increase plant availability and help operating personnel prioritize alarm messages. Especially for safety-critical infrastructure, comprehensive documentation of alarms is also a prerequisite for regulatory compliance.
The cost depends primarily on the number of process control systems to be connected, the number of measurement points, and the effort required to integrate the system into the existing system landscape. A flat-rate price quote is therefore not very meaningful; for a reliable estimate, we recommend a no-obligation consultation with our sales team.
Leave us your details and we will send you the relevant documents.
In a demo, we'll show you what Plant Historian AM can do in your plant.
